So expressing a sense of humor via a play on words is something that you deem censor worthy?
I found no resistance, though I should have guessed it from how wet her pussy was when my tongue was working on her. He raised her slightly so she was able to properly go on all four legs.
"Maybe the farmer got in Femake car wreck," one man suggested. That fucking hurt!" "Language," murmurs Danny.
Why didnt you strip her. He shook his head, noticing she was at his desk, talking on his phone, hurriedly taking notes.
As we walked up a particularly long and steep hill, my dad changed the conversation to something I was not expecting. As she walked close to us, I swear I could make out a bit of moisture glistening on her lips. "Oh fuck.
That was the hard part? ;)
The thing is that I think it is time for the Democrats to fight fire with fire. The more the Republicans promote this kind of stuff & the Democrats just sit back & if they do say anything it gets drowned out by stuff like this.
And I assume that you believe that ALL of our public schools adequately prepare one for success at the next level?
People who?ve never been touched by it don?t know how to recognize the signs.
It was a *joke*.
Biden wanted a Photo Op which the owner refused, he never refused to sell to Biden nor did he kick him out.
Right... and girl, didn't even stop there. Old broad got her whole squad - her daughter and GRANDdaughters involved. I'm like... who does that at 40? My cousin has a little sister in HS, and the 40 year old got her granddaughters to start harassing her too. I just don't get it.
Actually, Harper was the protest vote against Martin. People parked their votes with him until the Liberals got their shit together. Then the silent majority stepped out of the shadows, to the tune of almost 3 million, to vote for Trudeau.
"And if so, is it consistent with 20th century mass murders (100 million) at the hands of Atheist Communist Dictators?"
I think "backlash against new laws for equality" is actually a great way to describe what's happening right now. Van Jones is, regularly, a fool, but "whitelash" was a good term for it too. "Make America Great Again" has a pretty pointed meaning.
What she's alleging Doug has done with Deco and her Brother's estate, however, is easily traceable through law.
Which would seem to contradict various POV on abortion.
that would have been so awkward. nope. After we made our initial cut and serve to each other, the head of the waitstaff cut the rest and served it to the guests.
No need. That's a cop-out on your part and you know it.
As being the word of God?
You won't be worried. You'll be in abject fear. The worst fear you've ever experienced. And there won't be any hope.
Yes it once belonged to Queen Mary and was on loan from the Queen.
I am not a mythicist. I do believe that there is a historical person as the base of the Jesus story. What I do not believe is the biblical Jesus. the idea that an apocalyptical preacher wandered around, preaching, healing the sick, curing lepers, make deaf hear, cripples walk and raising the dead, drawing "multitudes" and went unnoticed by every contemporary writer is ludicrous. There were 8 other would be messiahs that did get mentioned by contemporary writers, but the most famous of them all just got missed?
He's not going to get past Warriors if he goes there
That's just one representative.
I wouldn't even dare :D I'm still young for that
Being subjected is not equal to being attracted either.
i think its a woman in the suit.. look at the azz
Is that a type of alcohol?
That joke stinks
THe Lib member in Niagara has been in for 41 yrs now .....WTF its time for a change ....
Smh....just hire me
Well here how it goes
I think that the parameters you are using to define "religion" are false. Especially the broad range of eastern religions, as I understand them, have a very different view than you've laid out in your three statements:
I?ll do one at a time.
Lol well obviously Jesus doesn?t have much in the form of literal quotes on this subject matter. But I think it?s fairly reasonable to say that he would expect his followers to vote for people who were compassionate towards the most vulnerable members of society at the very least. I see it as a choice between people who will insult the dignity of poor people (and many others) while spending my money bombing poor countries vs the people who understand that taking away our safety net just means taking the money that working people use to make basic ends meet.